Skip to content

Biolivon publishes the science.

Investigational compound

TB-500

Also known as Thymosin beta-4 fragment, TB4 fragment

Actin-sequestering peptide fragment studied in wound healing and tissue repair models.

Human studies
0
Trials tracked
0
Preclinical
2
Safety signals
3
Last reviewed
5 Aug 2026
Reviewed by
Not yet reviewed

Animal and laboratory evidence for the parent protein is real and reasonably deep. Adequate human trial evidence for the synthetic fragment sold as TB-500 does not exist, and the two are routinely conflated in marketing.

This dossier has not been reviewed yet. Our editorial board is not appointed. Every page is supposed to carry a named scientific and medical reviewer with declared conflicts, and until that is true this page has had no expert check — treat it accordingly. We would rather say so than print a name-shaped placeholder where a person should be.
TB-500 is not an approved medicine for human use in the jurisdictions listed below. This page summarises research. It is not a recommendation, and it contains no dosing or administration guidance. If you are considering anything described here, discuss it with a qualified clinician.
On this page

What it is

A synthetic peptide corresponding to a fragment of thymosin beta-4, a naturally occurring actin-binding protein involved in cell migration and wound repair. What is sold as TB-500 is the fragment, not the full protein studied in most of the literature.

How it is proposed to work

Actin sequestration influencing cell migration, angiogenesis and inflammatory signalling during repair. Whether the fragment reproduces the full protein's activity in humans is an open question and a fairly fundamental one.

Approved medical uses

None. TB-500 has no approved human medical indication in the jurisdictions we track. Any use is outside an approved label.

Human research

Each entry states what the study found and, separately, what it cannot show.

No adequate published human research. This absence is the reason for the evidence grade above — it is not a gap we can fill with animal data.

Preclinical research

Animal and laboratory work. Useful for generating hypotheses; it cannot establish that something works in people.

  • Animal2003

    Impaired-healing dermal wound models: diabetic and aged mice

    Finding. In full-thickness dermal wounds, thymosin beta-4 given in phosphate-buffered saline or a hydrogel formulation accelerated repair across more than one impaired-healing model. In db/db diabetic mice, wound contracture and collagen deposition were significantly increased with treatment, but keratinocyte migration showed no difference — all diabetic animals showed almost complete coverage of the wound at 8 days. In 26-month-old aged mice, whose healing was significantly delayed, treatment increased keratinocyte migration, wound contracture and collagen deposition. A seven-amino-acid synthetic peptide duplicating the actin-binding domain, LKKTETQ, promoted repair in the aged animals comparably to the parent molecule. The hydrogel formulation generally showed wound-healing activity similar to thymosin beta-4 in saline.

    Limitation. Rodent wound models — mice, with normal rats for the parent protein — and the abstract reports no animal counts. The peptide was given in saline or a hydrogel formulation for a skin wound; the abstract describes no systemic injection, which is how TB-500 is actually used for musculoskeletal injury. As abstracted, the seven-amino-acid actin-binding fragment was tested in the aged mice only; everything else here is the full-length parent protein. No cardiac outcomes and no human outcomes.

  • Animal2014

    Dermal burn wound healing in diabetic mice

    Finding. In db/db diabetic mice given a deep second-degree burn on the dorsal skin, thymosin beta-4 injected intradermally near the burn wound, twice a week for two weeks, improved wound-healing markers — wound closure, granulation and vascularization — and reduced levels of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) during the healing period. The authors frame this as a potential therapy for the impaired burn-wound healing associated with diabetes.

    Limitation. An animal study: diabetic mice, thymosin beta-4 itself rather than the fragment sold commercially, and repeated local intradermal injection near the wound rather than systemic dosing. The abstract reports healing markers qualitatively, with no effect sizes and no total animal count, and the model is a dermal burn — it says nothing about musculoskeletal injury in humans. The authors note that earlier thymosin beta-4 wound-repair work had been limited to mechanical damage and dermal impairment.

Potential safety concerns

  • SeriousInsufficient

    No adequate human safety dataset. Absence of reported harm reflects absence of systematic study, not a clean record.

  • SeriousPromising

    Independent testing has repeatedly found mislabelled and impure peptide products in this category.

  • CautionInsufficient

    Effects on angiogenesis and cell migration are the mechanism it is bought for and also the reason its oncological profile would need study before any reassurance is possible. That study does not exist.

Known interactions and contraindication considerations

  • Not characterised in humans.

This list is not exhaustive and is not a substitute for a clinician reviewing your full medication history.

Regulatory status

Status is shown per jurisdiction and is accurate only as of the date stated. Where a compound is approved, the approval is bound to a specific formulation, manufacturer and indication — shown in the detail column.

United States
FDA
Not approved
as of 24 Jul 2026

Not approved. Has appeared in compounding-category discussion, which is not an approval. Prohibited in sport.

European Union
EMA
Unapproved / investigational
as of 1 Jun 2026

No marketing authorisation.

India
CDSCO
Unapproved / investigational
as of 1 Jun 2026

New-drug pathway would apply. Not approved for human use.

How it is being used

What the grey community actually runs, the reasoning they give, and our read on whether it follows from known biology. This is observation, not evidence, and not a recommendation.

Dose figures are withheld and are not present in this page. Route, frequency, timing, duration and stacking are shown in full — that is the shape of a practice, and the part that builds understanding. The magnitude depends on the person, which is exactly why it belongs in a consultation rather than on a web page.
Cellular repair & regeneration

Tissue repair, usually stacked with BPC-157

Reasoning is thin

What is run

Less frequent than BPC-157 — typically a loading pattern of a few administrations weekly, then reduced.

Their mechanistic reasoning

That actin sequestration promotes cell migration and angiogenesis at injury sites, complementing BPC-157's growth-factor effects through a separate pathway.

Reported in the community’s own terms. Not our position.

Stacked with

  • BPC-157—The near-universal pairing, on complementary-pathway reasoning.

Regimen shape

Dose
figure withheld
Scale
Milligram-scale
Route
Subcutaneous injection
Frequency
Two or three times weekly, reducing after an initial period
Timing
No consistent convention
Duration
Multi-week blocks

Our read

The pathway distinction is real and the complementarity argument is coherent. Two problems sit underneath it. The animal evidence largely studies the full thymosin beta-4 protein, while what is sold is a fragment — whether the fragment reproduces that activity in humans is unresolved and fairly fundamental. And no adequate human trial exists for either. Combining two untested compounds does not produce a tested one.

What the community reports

Community confidence: StrongBelief runs well ahead of the evidence

The comparison is between how sure the community is and how much is actually known — evidence strength, not direction. A compound can have solid research that came out negative.

Believed in largely by association with BPC-157 rather than on its own reports. Very few people run it alone, so its reputation is effectively borrowed.

Commonly reported as helping
  • Improved recovery when added to BPC-157
  • Reports of benefit in more systemic or widespread injury
Also reported, when it goes wrong
  • Hard to attribute anything to it specifically
  • Lethargy reported by some
  • Cost, given the amounts used
Why these reports can mislead

Almost every report comes from someone running it alongside BPC-157, so the compound has essentially no independent evidence base even at the anecdotal level. Its reputation is inherited rather than earned.

Direct quotations are not published here yet. We will only carry verbatim reports once they are sourced, dated and checked — an unattributed quote is a testimonial, and testimonials are exactly what this section exists to replace.

Watch for, in this use specifically

  • What is sold is a fragment, not the protein most of the cited research studied.
  • Angiogenesis and cell migration are the mechanism and also the reason the oncological profile would need study before anyone can offer reassurance.
  • Prohibited in sport.

All documented community practice, by therapeutic area

Active clinical trials

No registered trials currently tracked for TB-500.

Search all tracked trials

What remains unknown

The questions that would change our assessment if they were answered.

  • Does the commercial fragment reproduce the parent protein's activity at all?
  • Does systemic administration deliver anything to an injured site in humans?
  • What would repeated stimulation of angiogenesis and cell migration do over years?

References

  1. 1.Philp D, Badamchian M, Scheremeta B, Nguyen M, Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK. Thymosin beta 4 and a synthetic peptide containing its actin-binding domain promote dermal wound repair in db/db diabetic mice and in aged mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 Jan-Feb;11(1):19-24.PMID 12581423doi
  2. 2.Kim S, Kwon J. Thymosin beta 4 improves dermal burn wound healing via downregulation of receptor of advanced glycation end products in db/db mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Dec;1840(12):3452-9.PMID 25230158doi

Editorial change history

When we change a grade or a regulatory note, we log it here rather than editing quietly.

  • Dossier created. Note added distinguishing the commercial fragment from the full protein studied in most of the cited literature.

Spotted something wrong? Tell us — we publish corrections.