Skip to content

Biolivon publishes the science.

Approved therapeutic

Selank

Also known as Tuftsin analogue, Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-Pro-Gly-Pro

A tuftsin analogue used clinically in Russia for anxiety disorders.

Human studies
1
Trials tracked
0
Preclinical
0
Safety signals
2
Last reviewed
11 Aug 2026
Reviewed by
Not yet reviewed

Like Semax, a compound in real clinical use in Russia that Western frameworks would wrongly file as an untested research chemical. The same limitation applies and it is about reach, not origin: the supporting literature is largely Russian-language and we located no independent replication outside that tradition.

This dossier has not been reviewed yet. Our editorial board is not appointed. Every page is supposed to carry a named scientific and medical reviewer with declared conflicts, and until that is true this page has had no expert check — treat it accordingly. We would rather say so than print a name-shaped placeholder where a person should be.
On this page

What it is

A synthetic heptapeptide derived from tuftsin, an immunomodulatory fragment of immunoglobulin G, with a stabilising extension. Developed in Russia and used there clinically, administered intranasally.

How it is proposed to work

Proposed anxiolytic action through effects on GABAergic and monoaminergic signalling and on enkephalin degradation, without the sedation, dependence or withdrawal associated with benzodiazepines. That comparison is the central clinical claim made for it.

Approved medical uses

Used in Russia for anxiety and adjustment disorders. Not approved in the US, EU or India.

Human research

Each entry states what the study found and, separately, what it cannot show.

  • Controlled human trial2008n = 62

    Selank compared with medazepam in generalised anxiety disorder and neurasthenia

    Finding. Sixty-two patients with generalised anxiety disorder and neurasthenia were studied, with selank (30 patients) compared against the benzodiazepine medazepam (32 patients) and assessed on the Hamilton, Zung and CGI scales. On the anxiolytic endpoint the report states: "The anxiolytic effects of both drugs were similar but selank had also antiasthenic and psychostimulant effects." That is a failure to detect a difference between the two groups, which in an unrandomised, unblinded comparison of roughly thirty patients per arm is a null contrast rather than demonstrated equivalence. Serum enkephalin activity was measured alongside as a biomarker: patients were reported to have a decreased level of tau(1/2) leu-enkephalin, read here as a half-life parameter, correlating with disease duration and with the severity of anxiety, asthenia and autonomic symptoms, and this parameter rose, with stronger positive correlations with anxiety level, during selank treatment mostly in the generalised anxiety subgroup. That is a pharmacodynamic observation with no demonstrated relation to clinical benefit, and the subgroup split is not stated to have been pre-specified.

    Limitation. Russian-language report; the abstract describes a comparison between two treated groups but does not state that allocation was randomised or that either patients or raters were blinded, so it is typed as a controlled trial rather than an RCT. No effect sizes, confidence intervals, dosing or tolerability comparison appear in the abstract, so the claim that selank matches a benzodiazepine on anxiety cannot be sized from what is published there, and we located no replication of it outside the Russian literature. The PubMed record carries no author affiliations, so whether the trial was run by the institutes that developed selank could not be checked. One caution specific to this compound: an adversarial check found a fabricated Selank anxiety trial circulating in our research sources with complete invented figures, so any Selank trial number met elsewhere should be checked against the primary record. The benzodiazepine comparison is the most consequential claim made for this compound and the one we would most want to see reproduced independently.

Preclinical research

Animal and laboratory work. Useful for generating hypotheses; it cannot establish that something works in people.

No preclinical studies catalogued.

Potential safety concerns

  • WatchPreliminary

    The absence of dependence and withdrawal is the main claimed advantage over benzodiazepines. If real it matters a great deal; we could not verify it from accessible primary sources.

  • CautionEstablished

    Anxiety that warrants treatment warrants a clinician. Self-managing it with an unverified grey-market product delays care that works.

Known interactions and contraindication considerations

  • Not well characterised in accessible literature. Interaction with other anxiolytics is unstudied.

This list is not exhaustive and is not a substitute for a clinician reviewing your full medication history.

Regulatory status

Status is shown per jurisdiction and is accurate only as of the date stated. Where a compound is approved, the approval is bound to a specific formulation, manufacturer and indication — shown in the detail column.

Russian Federation
Ministry of Health / Roszdravnadzor
Approved
as of 11 Aug 2026

Marketed in Russia. Our check could not confirm current status against the state register itself — the certificate details in circulation come from commercial drug references, which retain entries after registrations lapse. Verify directly before relying on this. Reported indications centre on generalised anxiety and adjustment disorders. Reports that it moved to non-prescription status are manufacturer-sourced and unconfirmed.

United States
FDA
Unapproved / investigational
as of 11 Aug 2026

No marketing authorisation. The FDA has not evaluated this compound — that is an absence of any opinion, not a negative finding.

European Union
EMA
Unapproved / investigational
as of 11 Aug 2026

No marketing authorisation.

India
CDSCO
Unapproved / investigational
as of 11 Aug 2026

Not approved for human use. A first-time synthetically manufactured peptide falls under the new-drug pathway.

How it is being used

What the grey community actually runs, the reasoning they give, and our read on whether it follows from known biology. This is observation, not evidence, and not a recommendation.

No community use documented for this compound yet. Absence here means our editorial team has not reviewed and verified a pattern — not that none exists.

Active clinical trials

No registered trials currently tracked for Selank.

Search all tracked trials

What remains unknown

The questions that would change our assessment if they were answered.

  • Does the benzodiazepine comparison hold under independent blinded conditions?
  • Is the absence of dependence established or assumed from mechanism?

References

  1. 1.Zozulia AA, Neznamov GG, Siuniakov TS, et al. Efficacy and possible mechanisms of action of a new peptide anxiolytic selank in the therapy of generalized anxiety disorders and neurasthenia. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2008;108(4):38-48. [Article in Russian]PMID 18454096

Editorial change history

When we change a grade or a regulatory note, we log it here rather than editing quietly.

  • Dossier created. A fabricated anxiety trial with full fake figures was found circulating in our research sources and excluded.

Spotted something wrong? Tell us — we publish corrections.