Skip to content

Biolivon publishes the science.

Not a peptide

Glutathione

Also known as GSH, Reduced glutathione, γ-Glu-Cys-Gly

The body's principal intracellular antioxidant tripeptide, sold for injection and infusion.

Safety concernHealthy Aging
Human studies
1
Trials tracked
0
Preclinical
0
Safety signals
3
Last reviewed
11 Aug 2026
Reviewed by
Not yet reviewed

Graded for safety and for how it is used rather than for weak biology. Glutathione's physiological role is fundamental and uncontroversial. The concern is the injected and infused product sold for skin lightening and general wellness: that use has drawn public safety warnings from national regulators, and the oral supplement bioavailability problem is well known.

This dossier has not been reviewed yet. Our editorial board is not appointed. Every page is supposed to carry a named scientific and medical reviewer with declared conflicts, and until that is true this page has had no expert check — treat it accordingly. We would rather say so than print a name-shaped placeholder where a person should be.
On this page

What it is

A tripeptide of glutamate, cysteine and glycine, present in every cell and central to redox balance and detoxification. Not a research peptide in any meaningful sense — it is basic biochemistry, sold as a product.

How it is proposed to work

As an antioxidant and cofactor it is genuinely essential. The leap is from 'essential' to 'more is better when injected', which does not follow: levels are homeostatically regulated, and oral glutathione is extensively broken down before absorption.

Approved medical uses

Used medically in some countries in specific contexts, including as an adjunct in certain chemotherapy protocols. Those uses are narrow, supervised, and unrelated to wellness infusion.

Human research

Each entry states what the study found and, separately, what it cannot show.

  • Randomised controlled trial1995n = 50

    Reduced glutathione and cisplatin-induced neuropathy in advanced gastric cancer

    Finding. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced gastric cancer on a weekly cisplatin-based regimen, testing glutathione given around each cisplatin administration for prevention of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. At the 9th week no patients showed clinically evident neuropathy in the glutathione arm, against 16 patients in the placebo arm; after the 15th week four of 24 assessable patients in the glutathione arm had neurotoxicity versus 16 of 18 in the placebo arm (P = .0001). Median, ulnar and sural sensory nerve conduction fell significantly in the placebo arm but not in the glutathione arm, most clearly in potential amplitude. Response rate, a secondary comparison reported without a significance test, was 76% (20% complete) with glutathione and 52% (12% complete) with placebo, which the authors read as glutathione not reducing the activity of the cytotoxic drugs.

    Limitation. A narrow supervised oncology setting: glutathione was given by infusion immediately before each cisplatin dose and by injection on the following days, in advanced gastric cancer, as neuroprotection during chemotherapy. Fifty patients were enrolled, but by the 15th week the comparison rested on 24 patients in the glutathione arm and 18 in the placebo arm, a smaller group than the enrolled total. Nothing here speaks to glutathione infused for skin lightening or general wellness.

Preclinical research

Animal and laboratory work. Useful for generating hypotheses; it cannot establish that something works in people.

No preclinical studies catalogued.

Potential safety concerns

  • SeriousPromising

    Injectable glutathione for skin lightening has drawn public safety warnings from national regulators in the region where it is most heavily marketed, citing serious adverse events. This is a documented regulatory position, not a theoretical concern.

  • SeriousEstablished

    Intravenous administration in non-clinical settings carries the infusion risks common to all such practice: sterility failure, anaphylaxis, and no monitoring when something goes wrong.

  • CautionEstablished

    Skin lightening as a goal sits in an industry with a documented record of unsafe products. That context is part of the risk picture.

Known interactions and contraindication considerations

  • Relevant in oncology settings, where antioxidant supplementation during treatment is a genuine clinical question.

This list is not exhaustive and is not a substitute for a clinician reviewing your full medication history.

Regulatory status

Status is shown per jurisdiction and is accurate only as of the date stated. Where a compound is approved, the approval is bound to a specific formulation, manufacturer and indication — shown in the detail column.

United States
FDA
Not approved
as of 11 Aug 2026

Not approved for injection or infusion for skin lightening or general wellness. Compounded injectable products in this category have drawn regulatory attention.

European Union
EMA
Not approved
as of 11 Aug 2026

No authorisation for these uses.

India
CDSCO
Restricted
as of 11 Aug 2026

Injectable use for skin lightening is widely marketed across South and South-East Asia and has attracted regulatory warnings in the region. Confirm current CDSCO position before relying on this.

How it is being used

What the grey community actually runs, the reasoning they give, and our read on whether it follows from known biology. This is observation, not evidence, and not a recommendation.

No community use documented for this compound yet. Absence here means our editorial team has not reviewed and verified a pattern — not that none exists.

Active clinical trials

No registered trials currently tracked for Glutathione.

Search all tracked trials

What remains unknown

The questions that would change our assessment if they were answered.

  • Does raising systemic glutathione produce any outcome a person notices?
  • Is the skin-lightening effect real, and if so through what mechanism?

References

  1. 1.Cascinu S, Cordella L, Del Ferro E, et al. Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 1995.PMID 7799029doi

Editorial change history

When we change a grade or a regulatory note, we log it here rather than editing quietly.

  • Dossier created. Two specific harm statistics were excluded as uncited despite being offered as the justification for the grade; the grade rests instead on documented regulatory warnings.

Spotted something wrong? Tell us — we publish corrections.